Invoiced value, not calls
Rank channels by work actually invoiced rather than by phone calls received.
For Pest Control
Match recurring service revenue to the calls and ads that produced the customer — because a one-off treatment is not the business.
No card required · Nothing to install · Cancel anytime
The blind spot
A one-off treatment is worth a couple of hundred dollars; a recurring plan is worth that every quarter for years. Call counts cannot tell them apart.
Rank channels by work actually invoiced rather than by phone calls received.
A quote given now and approved months later still traces to the ad that produced it.
No tracking numbers to provision, no app for the crew. Two exports.
Not impressions, not leads, not cost per click. Closed revenue, by the channel that produced it, for a period you choose — with the portion we could not trace shown rather than quietly shared out across your paid channels.
| Channel | Sales | Revenue | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Google Ads | 214 | $171,000 | |
| Meta Ads | 68 | $49,500 | |
| Email marketing | 54 | $40,500 | |
| Direct / Unknown | 231 | $189,000 |
Pest control economics are built on recurring plans. A channel producing cheap one-off callouts and a channel producing plan customers look identical on a cost-per-lead report and are worth completely different amounts.
Ranking on billed revenue across a longer range separates them, because a plan customer keeps appearing and a one-off does not.
Urgent infestations arrive through search and convert immediately at a low ticket. Preventative plans come through different channels, convert more slowly and are worth far more over time.
Splitting the report by service type shows which channel is doing which — usually the difference between a budget that fills tomorrow and one that builds a book.
"We generated 400 leads" invites an argument. "This channel closed $186,400 last quarter, here is the reconciliation" ends one. The teams that can show closed revenue by channel are the teams that get the next increase approved, because they are asking with evidence rather than with conviction.
Killing spend is politically harder than adding it, because someone always owns the channel being cut. A number that reconciles to the sales export takes the argument out of the room — you are not overruling a colleague's judgement, you are reading the same ledger they are.
Platform-reported conversions do not reconcile to revenue, and eventually someone in finance notices. Reporting built from your own closed-sales export starts from the number finance already trusts, which is why it holds up when it is checked.
Because this reconciles exports rather than tracking visitors, it works on months that have already closed. You are not instrumenting now to learn something in ninety days — you can answer for last quarter today, which is usually when the question is being asked.
Which is why running over a longer range matters — every renewal traces back to the channel that produced the customer.
They still match; they are just worth less, and the report shows which channels produce them.
Any layout works — a contact detail, an amount and a date.
Flat monthly pricing with no per-call, per-minute or per-form fees. The number here is the number on the invoice. Most pest control land on Growth.
A single business getting started
$49/mo
billed monthly
A business scaling ad spend
$199/mo
billed monthly
One business closing at volume
$499/mo
billed monthly
Reporting on many clients at once
$799/mo
billed monthly
Billed services: a customer contact email or phone, the amount, and the date.
Upload two exports and see your real revenue by channel in minutes. Three days free, no card.
Start free