Care plans, not new patients
Rank channels by plans purchased and revenue billed rather than by offers redeemed.
For Chiropractors
Match care plans purchased and visits billed to the offers, ads and referrals that produced the patient.
No card required · Nothing to install · Cancel anytime
The blind spot
New-patient offers fill the diary cheaply and convert to care plans at wildly different rates. Nothing in a cost-per-lead report tells you which offer produced patients who stayed.
Rank channels by plans purchased and revenue billed rather than by offers redeemed.
Run over a longer range and every visit traces back to the acquiring channel.
No scripts, no tracking numbers. Two exports from systems you already run.
Not impressions, not leads, not cost per click. Closed revenue, by the channel that produced it, for a period you choose — with the portion we could not trace shown rather than quietly shared out across your paid channels.
| Channel | Sales | Revenue | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Meta Ads | 88 | $52,200 | |
| Google Ads | 61 | $39,600 | |
| Email marketing | 34 | $19,800 | |
| Direct / Unknown | 104 | $68,400 |
Discounted first visits fill a diary and tell you nothing about who will convert to a plan. Different channels produce very different conversion, and the cheapest new patient is frequently the least likely to continue.
Ranking on billed care rather than redemptions shows which offer and which channel produce patients who buy a plan — which is the only outcome that funds the practice.
Chiropractic practices are built on referral and reputation more than on advertising. Any tool showing a high attributed share is quietly redistributing that.
A large Direct / Unknown bucket is correct here, and knowing its size tells you whether the marketing question is acquisition or retention.
"We generated 400 leads" invites an argument. "This channel closed $186,400 last quarter, here is the reconciliation" ends one. The teams that can show closed revenue by channel are the teams that get the next increase approved, because they are asking with evidence rather than with conviction.
Killing spend is politically harder than adding it, because someone always owns the channel being cut. A number that reconciles to the sales export takes the argument out of the room — you are not overruling a colleague's judgement, you are reading the same ledger they are.
Platform-reported conversions do not reconcile to revenue, and eventually someone in finance notices. Reporting built from your own closed-sales export starts from the number finance already trusts, which is why it holds up when it is checked.
Because this reconciles exports rather than tracking visitors, it works on months that have already closed. You are not instrumenting now to learn something in ninety days — you can answer for last quarter today, which is usually when the question is being asked.
Then that shows as Direct / Unknown, honestly. Its size is the finding — it usually says more about the practice than the ad account does.
Which is why redemptions are the wrong measure. Rank on billed care and the picture changes.
Any layout works — a contact detail, an amount and a date.
Flat monthly pricing with no per-call, per-minute or per-form fees. The number here is the number on the invoice. Most chiropractors land on Growth.
A single business getting started
$49/mo
billed monthly
A business scaling ad spend
$199/mo
billed monthly
One business closing at volume
$499/mo
billed monthly
Reporting on many clients at once
$799/mo
billed monthly
Billed visits or care plans: a patient phone number or email, the amount, and the date.
Upload two exports and see your real revenue by channel in minutes. Three days free, no card.
Start free