Fees, not enquiries
Rank channels by fees earned so one signed matter outweighs fifty enquiries.
For Employment Law
Match retained matters and fees to the enquiries and campaigns behind them, on both the claimant and employer side.
No card required · Nothing to install · Cancel anytime
The blind spot
Employment work splits into two businesses with different economics. Aggregate enquiry counts hide which channel feeds the profitable one.
Rank channels by fees earned so one signed matter outweighs fifty enquiries.
A matter signed this year and resolved next still traces to the ad behind it.
Only exact matches count automatically; anything weaker is flagged rather than assumed.
Not impressions, not leads, not cost per click. Closed revenue, by the channel that produced it, for a period you choose — with the portion we could not trace shown rather than quietly shared out across your paid channels.
| Channel | Sales | Revenue | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Google Ads | 31 | $153,000 | |
| LinkedIn Ads | 9 | $76,500 | |
| Email marketing | 5 | $31,500 | |
| Direct / Unknown | 32 | $189,000 |
Claimant matters arrive from search, often urgently, and are frequently contingent. Employer advisory work arrives through professional networks and bills hourly on retainer. Combining them into one lead count produces a ranking that describes neither.
A matter-type column splits the report, and the two rankings usually disagree — which is the finding, and the reason to run it.
An employer who arrives for one dismissal question and stays on retainer for four years is worth many times a single claim, and no attribution tool credits the original campaign for year three.
Because the match is on the client rather than a session, later fees from the same client credit the channel that produced them whenever they land.
"We generated 400 leads" invites an argument. "This channel closed $186,400 last quarter, here is the reconciliation" ends one. The teams that can show closed revenue by channel are the teams that get the next increase approved, because they are asking with evidence rather than with conviction.
Killing spend is politically harder than adding it, because someone always owns the channel being cut. A number that reconciles to the sales export takes the argument out of the room — you are not overruling a colleague's judgement, you are reading the same ledger they are.
Platform-reported conversions do not reconcile to revenue, and eventually someone in finance notices. Reporting built from your own closed-sales export starts from the number finance already trusts, which is why it holds up when it is checked.
Because this reconciles exports rather than tracking visitors, it works on months that have already closed. You are not instrumenting now to learn something in ninety days — you can answer for last quarter today, which is usually when the question is being asked.
Which is why a matter-type column matters — the report splits and ranks each separately.
Upload the referral list as a source file and it ranks alongside paid channels for the first time.
A contact detail, a fee and a date. No matter details of any kind.
Flat monthly pricing with no per-call, per-minute or per-form fees. The number here is the number on the invoice. Most employment law land on Growth.
A single business getting started
$49/mo
billed monthly
A business scaling ad spend
$199/mo
billed monthly
One business closing at volume
$499/mo
billed monthly
Reporting on many clients at once
$799/mo
billed monthly
Retained matters: a client contact email or phone, the fee, and a date.
Upload two exports and see your real revenue by channel in minutes. Three days free, no card.
Start free