Programme revenue, not signups
Rank channels by revenue billed across the programme rather than by first payments.
For Weight Loss Clinics
Match programme revenue and repeat prescriptions to the enquiries and ads that produced the patient — because month one is not the business.
No card required · Nothing to install · Cancel anytime
The blind spot
Enquiry volume in this category is enormous and cheap. Programme revenue depends entirely on how long patients stay, and enquiry counts say nothing about that.
Rank channels by revenue billed across the programme rather than by first payments.
Run over a longer range and every month a patient stays traces to the acquiring channel.
No scripts, no tracking numbers. Two exports.
Not impressions, not leads, not cost per click. Closed revenue, by the channel that produced it, for a period you choose — with the portion we could not trace shown rather than quietly shared out across your paid channels.
| Channel | Sales | Revenue | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Meta Ads | 214 | $97,200 | |
| Google Ads | 138 | $62,100 | |
| Email marketing | 96 | $35,100 | |
| Direct / Unknown | 171 | $75,600 |
A weight-management programme earns over months. A patient who signs up and stops after four weeks is worth a fraction of one who stays a year, and channels differ enormously on that measure.
Ranking by programme revenue over a longer range rather than by signups shows which channel produces patients who continue. It is common for the cheapest signup source to have the worst retention by a wide margin.
GLP-1 demand made enquiries abundant and cheap, which made cost per lead look excellent everywhere and stopped distinguishing between channels at all.
Revenue per acquired patient still distinguishes them sharply. That is the number that survives a demand spike.
"We generated 400 leads" invites an argument. "This channel closed $186,400 last quarter, here is the reconciliation" ends one. The teams that can show closed revenue by channel are the teams that get the next increase approved, because they are asking with evidence rather than with conviction.
Killing spend is politically harder than adding it, because someone always owns the channel being cut. A number that reconciles to the sales export takes the argument out of the room — you are not overruling a colleague's judgement, you are reading the same ledger they are.
Platform-reported conversions do not reconcile to revenue, and eventually someone in finance notices. Reporting built from your own closed-sales export starts from the number finance already trusts, which is why it holds up when it is checked.
Because this reconciles exports rather than tracking visitors, it works on months that have already closed. You are not instrumenting now to learn something in ninety days — you can answer for last quarter today, which is usually when the question is being asked.
Then the question is not volume but which channel produces patients who stay — which is exactly what ranking on programme revenue answers.
Run the report over a longer range and their whole history traces back to the acquiring channel.
The match needs a contact detail, an amount and a date. Keep prescriptions and clinical notes out of the export.
Flat monthly pricing with no per-call, per-minute or per-form fees. The number here is the number on the invoice. Most weight loss clinics land on Growth.
A single business getting started
$49/mo
billed monthly
A business scaling ad spend
$199/mo
billed monthly
One business closing at volume
$499/mo
billed monthly
Reporting on many clients at once
$799/mo
billed monthly
Billed programme revenue: a patient contact email or phone, the amount, and the date.
Upload two exports and see your real revenue by channel in minutes. Three days free, no card.
Start free