Commission, not enquiries
Channels rank by commission earned, so a channel producing few large transactions wins properly.
For Real Estate
Match closed transactions and commission to the enquiries and ads that produced them, however many months earlier that was.
No card required Nothing to install Cancel anytime
$351,000 65% of $540,000 paid
The blind spot
Portals, your own ads and referrals all claim the same buyer, and the transaction closes six months after the click — long after any platform is willing to take credit for it.
What you get
Channels rank by commission earned, so a channel producing few large transactions wins properly.
There is no attribution window to expire. A closing matches the enquiry that produced it whenever it lands.
Portal claims are checked against your own closings rather than taken at face value.
A worked example
Not impressions, not leads, not cost per click. Closed revenue, by the channel that produced it, for a period you choose — with the portion we could not trace shown rather than quietly shared out across your paid channels.
| Channel | Sales | Revenue | Share | % |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Google Ads | 12 | $145,800 | 27% | |
| Portals | 10 | $118,800 | 22% | |
| Meta Ads | 8 | $86,400 | 16% | |
| Direct / Unknown | 15 | $189,000 | 35% |
A buyer enquires in February and closes in September. By then the cookie is long gone, the ad account has closed seven monthly reports, and the campaign that produced the transaction is showing a cost per lead and nothing else.
Matching on the person rather than the session means the September commission is credited to the February enquiry. For a business where the gap between first contact and closing is routinely six months, this is the difference between measuring marketing and guessing at it.
Portal fees are often the largest single marketing cost in a brokerage, and the reporting comes from the portal itself. Checking it means matching the buyers a portal says it sent against the transactions that actually closed.
That check tends to be uncomfortable in both directions: portals sometimes produce far less than claimed, and sometimes produce the highest-value transactions while looking mediocre on enquiry count. Either way it is a number worth having before the renewal conversation.
Why it matters
"We generated 400 leads" invites an argument. "This channel closed $186,400 last quarter, here is the reconciliation" ends one. The teams that can show closed revenue by channel are the teams that get the next increase approved, because they are asking with evidence rather than with conviction.
Killing spend is politically harder than adding it, because someone always owns the channel being cut. A number that reconciles to the sales export takes the argument out of the room — you are not overruling a colleague's judgement, you are reading the same ledger they are.
Platform-reported conversions do not reconcile to revenue, and eventually someone in finance notices. Reporting built from your own closed-sales export starts from the number finance already trusts, which is why it holds up when it is checked.
Because this reconciles exports rather than tracking visitors, it works on months that have already closed. You are not instrumenting now to learn something in ninety days — you can answer for last quarter today, which is usually when the question is being asked.
Honest answers
That is a real limitation — anything not captured is not matchable and will land in Direct / Unknown. A larger unattributed bucket is still more honest than a tool that redistributes it, and it also quantifies what better lead capture would be worth.
Export whichever figure you want to rank on — gross commission or the brokerage's share. The report ranks on what you give it, consistently.
Then Direct / Unknown will be large and should be. Knowing that referral is a third of commission is a finding; hiding it inside Google Ads is a distortion.
Pricing
The number here is the number on the invoice — no per-call, per-minute or per-form fees. Most brokerages, teams and new-home builders land on Growth — thirteen months of history to compare a month to the same month last year, and a PDF you can put in front of whoever holds the budget.
A business scaling ad spend
$199/mês
billed monthly
Questions
Anything else? Talk to us — a person answers, usually the same day.
Closed transactions: a client phone number or email, commission or sale price, and the closing date.
Yes — include an agent column and the report breaks down by it.
As long as your data covers. There is no window that expires, because there is no cookie involved.
That is one of the strongest uses. Match the portal's own lead export against your closings and see what actually converted.
Yes, and the long cycle suits it — a reservation taken months after the first enquiry still matches.
No. Your CRM or portal lead exports work as the second file.
Yes. Nothing had to be installed at the time, which matters when the sales cycle is longer than the trial.
Closed-transaction rows analysed in a calendar month. Enquiry rows do not count.
Nearby
Match your invoiced jobs to the calls and ads that produced them, and find out which channel is actually paying for the trucks.
See how it worksMatch your clients' closed-sales exports to their ad and call data, and hand them a per-channel revenue report at renewal time.
See how it worksMatch delivered vehicles and front-end gross to the calls, forms and ads that produced them.
See how it worksStart today
Upload two exports and see your real revenue by channel in minutes. Three days free, no card.