Enrolments and tuition, not enquiries
Rank channels by the tuition they produced rather than the forms they filled.
For Trade & Vocational Schools
Match starts and the tuition they generate to the campaigns and events that produced the applicant.
No card required · Nothing to install · Cancel anytime
The blind spot
Vocational enrolment marketing is judged on applications. Applications are cheap, starts are not, and the gap between the two is where the budget is lost.
Rank channels by the tuition they produced rather than the forms they filled.
Someone who enquired for one intake and started at the next still credits the original campaign.
Only exact matches count automatically; anything weaker is flagged rather than assumed.
Not impressions, not leads, not cost per click. Closed revenue, by the channel that produced it, for a period you choose — with the portion we could not trace shown rather than quietly shared out across your paid channels.
| Channel | Sales | Revenue | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Google Ads | 102 | $408,000 | |
| Meta Ads | 58 | $228,000 | |
| Career events | 33 | $132,000 | |
| Direct / Unknown | 109 | $432,000 |
Application-to-start rates vary enormously between channels. A channel producing applications at half the cost can produce starts at twice the cost, and the reporting most schools use cannot see that at all.
Ranking on tuition from actual starts is the correction, and it usually redirects a meaningful share of the budget within one cycle.
Vocational education is a heavily scrutinised category, and outcome claims are examined. An attribution model that guesses is not something you want in the file.
Only exact matches count automatically. Unmatched tuition stays in Direct / Unknown rather than being distributed across channels, so every figure traces back to two records.
"We generated 400 leads" invites an argument. "This channel closed $186,400 last quarter, here is the reconciliation" ends one. The teams that can show closed revenue by channel are the teams that get the next increase approved, because they are asking with evidence rather than with conviction.
Killing spend is politically harder than adding it, because someone always owns the channel being cut. A number that reconciles to the sales export takes the argument out of the room — you are not overruling a colleague's judgement, you are reading the same ledger they are.
Platform-reported conversions do not reconcile to revenue, and eventually someone in finance notices. Reporting built from your own closed-sales export starts from the number finance already trusts, which is why it holds up when it is checked.
Because this reconciles exports rather than tracking visitors, it works on months that have already closed. You are not instrumenting now to learn something in ninety days — you can answer for last quarter today, which is usually when the question is being asked.
Which is the problem. Applications that never start appear as unmatched leads and cost nothing against your allowance.
Export the tuition figure your finance team recognises; the match does not care where it came from.
Nothing is inferred and nothing is redistributed. Unmatched revenue is shown as unmatched.
Flat monthly pricing with no per-call, per-minute or per-form fees. The number here is the number on the invoice. Most trade & vocational schools land on Growth.
A single business getting started
$49/mo
billed monthly
A business scaling ad spend
$199/mo
billed monthly
One business closing at volume
$499/mo
billed monthly
Reporting on many clients at once
$799/mo
billed monthly
Starts or tuition: a student contact email or phone, the amount, and a date.
Upload two exports and see your real revenue by channel in minutes. Three days free, no card.
Start free