Enrolments and tuition, not enquiries
Rank channels by the tuition they produced rather than the forms they filled.
For Tutoring Centres
Match enrolled students and the tuition they pay across terms to the campaigns that produced the parent.
No card required · Nothing to install · Cancel anytime
The blind spot
Tutoring is bought term by term. A single enrolment fee makes every channel look marginal, when the actual outcome is a year of weekly sessions.
Rank channels by the tuition they produced rather than the forms they filled.
Someone who enquired for one intake and started at the next still credits the original campaign.
Only exact matches count automatically; anything weaker is flagged rather than assumed.
Not impressions, not leads, not cost per click. Closed revenue, by the channel that produced it, for a period you choose — with the portion we could not trace shown rather than quietly shared out across your paid channels.
| Channel | Sales | Revenue | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Google Ads | 64 | $112,000 | |
| Meta Ads | 35 | $59,500 | |
| Local partnerships | 18 | $31,500 | |
| Direct / Unknown | 84 | $147,000 |
A student who enrols for one term at $600 and stays for five is worth $3,000, and a sibling frequently follows. Judged on the first payment, every channel looks barely viable.
Because the match is on the parent, every later term credits the channel that produced them — and the channels producing families who stay are rarely the ones producing the cheapest enquiries.
Enrolment spikes before exams and collapses in summer. Comparing consecutive months tells you about the calendar, not about the marketing.
With no attribution window, the same term can be compared against the same term last year, which is the only comparison that isolates what changed in the marketing.
"We generated 400 leads" invites an argument. "This channel closed $186,400 last quarter, here is the reconciliation" ends one. The teams that can show closed revenue by channel are the teams that get the next increase approved, because they are asking with evidence rather than with conviction.
Killing spend is politically harder than adding it, because someone always owns the channel being cut. A number that reconciles to the sales export takes the argument out of the room — you are not overruling a colleague's judgement, you are reading the same ledger they are.
Platform-reported conversions do not reconcile to revenue, and eventually someone in finance notices. Reporting built from your own closed-sales export starts from the number finance already trusts, which is why it holds up when it is checked.
Because this reconciles exports rather than tracking visitors, it works on months that have already closed. You are not instrumenting now to learn something in ninety days — you can answer for last quarter today, which is usually when the question is being asked.
Which is why later terms must credit the original channel — that is where the difference between channels shows.
Which the Direct / Unknown bucket is honest about. The report measures the part you pay for.
None of it is needed. A parent contact detail, an amount and a date, nothing else.
Flat monthly pricing with no per-call, per-minute or per-form fees. The number here is the number on the invoice.
A single business getting started
$49/mo
billed monthly
A business scaling ad spend
$199/mo
billed monthly
One business closing at volume
$499/mo
billed monthly
Reporting on many clients at once
$799/mo
billed monthly
Enrolments or tuition payments: a parent email or phone, the amount, and a date.
Upload two exports and see your real revenue by channel in minutes. Three days free, no card.
Start free