Two quarters between sale and delivery
Site work, permits and transport sit between the deposit and the revenue. The match is on the buyer, so the gap does not break the credit.
For Manufactured Home Dealers
Match delivered homes and the gross they earned to campaigns that ran two quarters before the keys changed hands.
No card required Nothing to install Cancel anytime
$3,648,000 57% of $6,400,000 paid
The blind spot
A home sells in March and is delivered in September. Your ad report closed the March book long before anyone got paid.
What you get
Site work, permits and transport sit between the deposit and the revenue. The match is on the buyer, so the gap does not break the credit.
A single-section and a multi-section home are one lead each and tens of thousands apart. The report uses the delivered price.
Only exact matches count automatically. Anything weaker is flagged, so a manager can check it rather than inherit it.
A worked example
Not impressions, not leads, not cost per click. Closed revenue, by the channel that produced it, for a period you choose — with the portion we could not trace shown rather than quietly shared out across your paid channels.
| Channel | Sales | Revenue | Share | % |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Google Ads | 13 | $1,728,000 | 27% | |
| Meta Ads | 6 | $896,000 | 14% | |
| Listing portals | 7 | $1,024,000 | 16% | |
| Direct / Unknown | 20 | $2,752,000 | 43% |
A new manufactured home averages well over a hundred thousand dollars, and a multi-section home considerably more. Between the agreement and the revenue sit land, a site inspection, permits, a foundation, transport and set — commonly five to eight months.
That is a different business from a vehicle sale, even though the dealership floor looks similar. Financing splits between chattel and real-property loans depending on whether the buyer owns land, and that changes both the cycle and the close rate for the same advertisement.
Matching delivered homes back to the original enquiry is the only way to compare channels on the outcome that matters, because the enquiry and the revenue are almost never in the same reporting period.
A buyer placing a home on their own land has a longer cycle, a larger home and a mortgage-like process. A buyer moving into a land-lease community closes faster on a smaller home. The same keyword produces both.
A placement-type column splits them so the report does not average two unrelated businesses into one cost per sale, which is what makes most dealership channel reporting unusable.
A signed purchase agreement on the lot is a long way from money. The buyer has to be approved, and approval depends on whether the home is going onto land they own, onto leased land in a community, or onto a family member's plot, because each of those runs through a different kind of lender with different terms. Applications get declined, co-signers get added, deposits get returned and homes come back into inventory weeks after everybody shook hands. The deal is signed, celebrated, logged and then quietly unwound, and no marketing report anywhere reflects that it happened.
If the export counts agreements rather than funded, delivered homes, the channel ranking is measuring optimism. Sources differ sharply on this: one produces buyers who are already pre-approved and clear underwriting easily, another produces walk-ins with enthusiasm and no credit file. On cost per sale the two look similar, and the salesperson on the lot already knows they are not. One of those channels can be scaled and the other cannot, and the difference shows up in the funding rate rather than anywhere on the media account. Nothing in the platform can see an underwriting decision.
Exporting funded or delivered deals rather than written ones is the single most important choice a dealer makes before the first upload. It also makes the report reconcile to what the accounts recognise, which matters when the general manager is deciding whether to believe it. A status column lets written and funded be reported separately if the dealer wants to see the gap by source. The gap is often large enough to be the most useful single figure on the first report, because it separates demand the dealership can serve from demand it merely attracted.
The sticker price of the home is the number everybody quotes and the least useful one for judging a channel. Real margin on a deal is assembled from several places: the home itself, the set and the foundation, skirting and steps, air conditioning and appliances, the delivery, and commissions on insurance and service agreements. Two deals at the same price can differ by tens of thousands in what the dealership actually earned. A general manager knows this instinctively and has no way to hold a campaign to it, because the media report only ever sees one of those numbers.
Trade-ins and used homes make it wider still. A reconditioned home sold off the back of the lot can carry better margin than a new multi-section unit, while looking like a small sale on any report built on price. A source that reliably produces used-home buyers may therefore be the most profitable thing the dealership advertises and the worst-performing line on its media report. It is also the deal the dealership can actually source, which matters in a market where new inventory arrives on the manufacturer's timetable rather than the buyer's.
The fix is to export gross rather than price where the accounting system produces it, and to carry a home-type column alongside. The report then ranks channels on what was earned, split by new, used and multi-section, which is the breakdown that decides whether a campaign is bought again. Nothing has to be modelled; the column simply travels with the row. What the report ranks is whatever column the accounts already trust, and that is usually the one the dealer principal reads on a Monday morning anyway.
Most home centres capture demand on paper or in a simple log: the up sheet, a visitor book, a spreadsheet the sales manager keeps. It records a name, a telephone number, a date and possibly which model the family walked through. It is filled in by a salesperson between appointments and nobody audits it, because no money depends on it. Six months later, when the home is delivered, nobody revisits it at all. It is, in practice, the only record that the family ever came to the lot before the paperwork started.
That log is nevertheless a perfectly usable enquiry file. It has the two things the match needs, a contact detail and a date, and it was written down at the moment demand arrived rather than reconstructed afterwards. Uploaded alongside the ad platform export and any call records, it turns lot traffic into a channel that can be ranked next to paid search rather than disappearing into a walk-in total. A hundred handwritten lines become a hundred rows, and the walk-in bucket stops being a place where all the unanswered questions are kept.
This is why a dealership that has never tracked anything can still produce a defensible report for a completed year. The delivered-deal export exists because the business had to invoice and title the homes. The up sheet exists because somebody wanted to follow up. Neither was kept for marketing, which is precisely what makes them reliable. That is the whole argument for working from exports rather than from tags: the files that were kept for money are the files that were kept properly, and they were kept whether anybody was measuring or not.
Why it matters
"We generated 400 leads" invites an argument. "This channel closed $186,400 last quarter, here is the reconciliation" ends one. The teams that can show closed revenue by channel are the teams that get the next increase approved, because they are asking with evidence rather than with conviction.
Killing spend is politically harder than adding it, because someone always owns the channel being cut. A number that reconciles to the sales export takes the argument out of the room — you are not overruling a colleague's judgement, you are reading the same ledger they are.
Platform-reported conversions do not reconcile to revenue, and eventually someone in finance notices. Reporting built from your own closed-sales export starts from the number finance already trusts, which is why it holds up when it is checked.
Because this reconciles exports rather than tracking visitors, it works on months that have already closed. You are not instrumenting now to learn something in ninety days — you can answer for last quarter today, which is usually when the question is being asked.
Honest answers
It does not need to be. If it exports delivered deals with a buyer contact detail, an amount and a date, that is the file.
Many of them searched first. The report is honest about what it cannot match, and the Direct bucket stays a real answer rather than a rounding error.
Export gross instead of price and the report ranks on gross. The column is yours to choose.
Pricing
The number here is the number on the invoice — no per-call, per-minute or per-form fees. Most manufactured and modular home retailers land on Growth — thirteen months of history to compare a month to the same month last year, and a PDF you can put in front of whoever holds the budget.
A business scaling ad spend
$199/mo
billed monthly
Questions
Anything else? Talk to us — a person answers, usually the same day.
Delivered or funded homes: a buyer phone or email, the amount or gross, and a date.
Whichever your accounts recognise. The match works from either, as long as it is consistent.
Yes, with a placement-type column.
Yes, with a location column, on Growth and above, which keeps one strong performer from carrying the appearance of the others.
Yes, with the relevant column, so each one can be funded against its own delivered revenue rather than a portfolio figure.
No. It helps where buyers call rather than fill in forms, but the report does not depend on it.
Yes, and with a six-month cycle you should — a short file will understate every channel.
Encrypted in transit and at rest, isolated to your workspace, and deletable in one click. A DPA is available, and buyer details never leave that workspace.
Funded and delivered. Written agreements include buyers who never clear underwriting, and sources differ sharply in how many of those they produce, which is exactly what the report exists to show.
Yes, if the export carries gross. Set-up, skirting, air conditioning, delivery and finance commissions vary widely between deals, so price alone ranks channels on the wrong number.
Yes. A name, a telephone number and a date is everything required, and a log written at the moment somebody walked onto the lot is better evidence than anything reconstructed later.
Yes, with a home-type column. A reconditioned home can out-earn a new unit on margin while looking like a small sale on any report built on price alone.
It never funds, so it never appears as revenue. That is the point of exporting delivered deals: cancelled agreements stop crediting whichever source produced the enthusiasm behind them.
Yes, if the enquiry file and the funded-deal file are both uploaded. The ratio between them is the difference between a source producing shoppers and one producing buyers.
Nearby
Match filled lots and the years of site rent they earn to the campaigns that produced the resident.
See how it worksMatch signed home contracts and their value to the campaigns and events that produced the buyer, a year or more earlier.
See how it worksMatch option fees and the rent they earn over the option period to the campaigns that produced the household.
See how it worksStart today
Upload two exports and see your real revenue by channel in minutes. Three days free, no card.