Cookie preferences

Choose what we may use. Strictly necessary cookies keep you signed in and can't be turned off; everything else is your call and changes nothing about how the site works. You can change your mind any time from the footer.

Marketing attribution for gutter and siding companies

Which channels produced signed exterior jobs?

Match signed jobs and their value to the calls and campaigns that produced them, including the work that follows a roof.

  • No card required
  • Nothing to install
  • Cancel anytime
Gutters & Siding workspace FY2026 Sample data
Signed jobs traced to a channel

$199,500 57% of $350,000 paid

  • Google Ads $105,000 · 30%
  • Local service ads $63,000 · 18%
  • Meta Ads $31,500 · 9%
  • Direct / Unknown $150,500 · 43%
Direct / Unknown is shown, never shared out across the channels above.
Google Ads · LeadFY2026 14 · (•••) •••-0134
Closed sale · FY2026 27$2,140
Matched · high confidence

The blind spot

What's actually happening

Gutter cleaning and full siding replacement arrive through the same channels and are fifty times apart in value.

What you get

Built for gutter and siding companies.

Revenue, not calls

Rank on invoiced revenue, so a single high-value job is not averaged away by the noise around it.

Quotes that close weeks later

Time between the advertisement and the invoiced revenue is irrelevant to the match, which is the reason this works where tag-based tracking does not.

Defensible before you raise a budget

Exact matches count; nothing weaker does on its own. That is deliberately conservative, because an invoiced revenue figure nobody can check is worth less than a smaller one they can.

A worked example

The number you can take into a budget meeting.

Not impressions, not leads, not cost per click. Closed revenue, by the channel that produced it, for a period you choose — with the portion we could not trace shown rather than quietly shared out across your paid channels.

Total revenue$350,000paid signed jobs
Attributed to a channel$199,50057% of revenue
Average deal$2,140per paid sale
Match rate57%of sales matched
ChannelSalesRevenueShare%
Google Ads49$105,00030%
Local service ads29$63,00018%
Meta Ads15$31,5009%
Direct / Unknown71$150,50043%
01

Small jobs are how the large ones start

A homeowner who books a gutter clean this autumn is a strong candidate for a full replacement within two years, and no click-based tool connects the two.

Because the match is on the customer, the later job credits the channel that produced them originally — which turns low-value acquisition work into a measurable investment rather than a cost.

02

Storm and hail seasons need their own comparison

Exterior demand spikes after weather events, and a channel that looks exceptional in a hail month can be unremarkable the rest of the year.

Running specific date ranges separates event-driven revenue from baseline, so budget decisions are not made on two weeks of unusual demand.

03

A gutter clean and a full siding replacement share a phone number

This trade spans an enormous range of ticket sizes under one brand. A gutter cleaning or a short repair is a low-hundreds job booked in a day. A complete siding replacement with fascia and soffit is a five-figure exterior renovation decided over weeks against competing quotes.

Both arrive through overlapping searches and are recorded as one job each. The small work dominates the volume, looks excellent on cost per lead, and contributes a small fraction of the revenue; the large work looks expensive to acquire and carries the year.

Ranking on invoiced revenue, with a job-type column mapped as Product / service, separates them, so each half of the business is seen on its own revenue rather than through a blended average that consistently flatters the cheap half.

04

The small job is an audition for the large one

A great deal of siding and fascia work is sold to households who first hired the company for something trivial. Somebody cleans the gutters, notices rot, mentions it, and is trusted because they have already been on the roof and behaved well.

That progression is one of the most reliable sources of large work in the trade, and no conventional report credits the advertisement that produced the original cleaning job — it is scored against a two-hundred-dollar invoice and forgotten.

Because the match is on the customer, the later replacement credits the channel that produced the first visit. Channels that generate low-ticket volume stop looking like a commodity once the work they lead to is attached to them.

05

Weather creates demand and destroys comparability

Storms, heavy leaf fall and hard winters all produce spikes in demand that have nothing to do with anything the marketing did. A channel that looks strong in the month after a storm is not necessarily a better channel; it was simply running when the phone rang.

Comparing consecutive months in this trade is therefore close to meaningless, and it is the comparison every advertising platform offers by default.

Uploading two or three years lets the report compare the same weeks across years, which removes weather as a confound and is usually the only way to tell whether an off-season campaign is genuinely working or simply being carried by conditions.

Why it matters

What changes when you can prove it.

You stop defending the budget and start growing it

"We generated 400 leads" invites an argument. "This channel closed $186,400 last quarter, here is the reconciliation" ends one. The teams that can show closed revenue by channel are the teams that get the next increase approved, because they are asking with evidence rather than with conviction.

You can cut the wrong channel without a fight

Killing spend is politically harder than adding it, because someone always owns the channel being cut. A number that reconciles to the sales export takes the argument out of the room — you are not overruling a colleague's judgment, you are reading the same ledger they are.

Your reporting survives the finance review

Platform-reported conversions do not reconcile to revenue, and eventually someone in finance notices. Reporting built from your own closed-sales export starts from the number finance already trusts, which is why it holds up when it is checked.

You answer in an afternoon, not a quarter

Because this reconciles exports rather than tracking visitors, it works on months that have already closed. You are not instrumenting now to learn something in ninety days — you can answer for last quarter today, which is usually when the question is being asked.

Honest answers

The pushback we hear from Gutters & Siding.

They say

Our jobs range from tiny to major.

We say

Which is why revenue rather than job count is the ranking, and why later jobs must credit the original channel.

They say

Demand follows the weather.

We say

Run the report on specific date ranges. There is no attribution window, so any period can be compared to the same period last year.

They say

We use a simple job book.

We say

If it exports signed jobs to CSV, that is enough.

Pricing

Flat monthly pricing. No per-call fees.

The price here is the price on the invoice, plus any sales tax that applies — no per-call, per-minute or per-form fees. Starter usually fits gutter, siding and exterior contractors — one workspace, one seat, and everything that makes the number defensible from the first plan.

Starter

A single business getting started

$9/mo

billed monthly

  • 1 workspace · 1 seat
  • 100 sales records / month
  • 6-month saved history
  • Phone + email matching with confidence tiers
  • Assisted column mapping
  • CSV export

Questions

Questions we get about Gutters & Siding.

Anything else? Talk to us — a person answers, usually the same day.

Signed jobs: a customer email or phone, the amount, and a date.

Start today

Stop guessing which ads pay off.

Upload two exports and see your real revenue by channel in minutes. 14 days free, no card.