For Logistics & Freight

Which channels produced shippers who ship?

Match booked freight revenue to the enquiries and campaigns that produced the shipper, across a relationship that builds over months.

No card required Nothing to install Cancel anytime

Logistics & Freight workspace FY2026
Booked freight traced to a channel

$855,000 57% of $1,500,000 paid

  • Google Ads $465,000 · 31%
  • LinkedIn Ads $210,000 · 14%
  • Email marketing $180,000 · 12%
  • Direct / Unknown $645,000 · 43%
Direct / Unknown is shown, never shared out across the channels above.
Google Ads · LeadFY2026 14 · (•••) •••-0134
Closed sale · FY2026 27$4,100
Matched · high confidence

The blind spot

What's actually happening

A shipper enquiry is worth nothing until they tender freight, and worth a great deal once they tender regularly. Lead volume tells you which channel produces enquiries, not which produces shippers.

What you get

Built for Logistics & Freight.

Booked revenue, not enquiries

Rank channels by freight actually booked rather than by forms filled in.

Ongoing relationships, not one loads

Run over a longer range and every load a shipper tenders traces to the channel that won them.

Nothing to install

No tracking numbers, no script. Two exports from systems you already run.

A worked example

The number you can take into a budget meeting.

Not impressions, not leads, not cost per click. Closed revenue, by the channel that produced it, for a period you choose — with the portion we could not trace shown rather than quietly shared out across your paid channels.

Total revenue$1,500,000paid booked freight
Attributed to a channel$855,00057% of revenue
Average deal$4,100per paid sale
Match rate68%of sales matched
ChannelSalesRevenueShare%
Google Ads118$465,00031%
LinkedIn Ads46$210,00014%
Email marketing51$180,00012%
Direct / Unknown149$645,00043%
01

A shipper is worth their whole tender history, not their first load

The value of winning a shipper is every load they tender afterwards. Measuring acquisition on the first booking undervalues whichever channel brings shippers who stay, which in this business is the only kind worth having.

Because matching is on the shipper contact rather than a session, running the report across a year credits the full tender history back to the channel that produced the original enquiry. That comparison usually reorders the channel ranking substantially.

02

Carrier sales and shipper sales are different funnels

Brokerages spend on both sides and frequently measure them together, which produces a blended number that describes neither.

Splitting the report by side shows which channels produce shippers and which produce carrier capacity. They are rarely the same, and the economics of each are different enough that a blended cost per lead is close to meaningless.

Why it matters

What changes when you can prove it.

You stop defending the budget and start growing it

"We generated 400 leads" invites an argument. "This channel closed $186,400 last quarter, here is the reconciliation" ends one. The teams that can show closed revenue by channel are the teams that get the next increase approved, because they are asking with evidence rather than with conviction.

You can cut the wrong channel without a fight

Killing spend is politically harder than adding it, because someone always owns the channel being cut. A number that reconciles to the sales export takes the argument out of the room — you are not overruling a colleague's judgement, you are reading the same ledger they are.

Your reporting survives the finance review

Platform-reported conversions do not reconcile to revenue, and eventually someone in finance notices. Reporting built from your own closed-sales export starts from the number finance already trusts, which is why it holds up when it is checked.

You answer in an afternoon, not a quarter

Because this reconciles exports rather than tracking visitors, it works on months that have already closed. You are not instrumenting now to learn something in ninety days — you can answer for last quarter today, which is usually when the question is being asked.

Honest answers

The pushback we hear from Logistics & Freight.

They say

Our TMS export is enormous.

We say

Only booked loads need to be in it, with a shipper contact detail, the revenue and a date. Aggregate by shipper and month if the load count is large.

They say

Most of our freight comes from existing relationships.

We say

Which is why they land in Direct / Unknown rather than being credited to this month's ads. Its size is a genuinely useful number.

They say

We buy leads from load boards and directories.

We say

Upload their exports as the source file. Matching them against booked freight is the fastest way to see which are worth renewing.

Pricing

Flat monthly pricing. No per-call fees.

The number here is the number on the invoice — no per-call, per-minute or per-form fees. Most freight brokerages, 3PLs and carriers land on Enterprise — ten seats for the team and the highest monthly record allowance, since a year of closed deals is a lot of rows.

Enterprise

One business closing at volume

$499/mo

billed monthly

  • 1 workspace · 10 seats
  • 25,000 sales records / month (+$49 per 10,000)
  • 24-month history
  • Campaign drill-down and period comparison
  • Single sign-on through your identity provider
  • Your logo on every report
  • Roles, permissions and guided onboarding
  • Priority support

Questions

Questions we get about Logistics & Freight.

Anything else? Talk to us — a person answers, usually the same day.

Booked loads or shipper revenue: a shipper contact email or phone, the revenue, and the date.

Start today

Stop guessing which ads pay off.

Upload two exports and see your real revenue by channel in minutes. Three days free, no card.