For Employment Law

Which channels produced fee-earning employment matters?

Match retained matters and fees to the enquiries and campaigns behind them, on both the claimant and employer side.

No card required Nothing to install Cancel anytime

Employment Law workspace FY2026
Fees traced to a channel

$261,000 58% of $450,000 paid

  • Google Ads $153,000 · 34%
  • LinkedIn Ads $76,500 · 17%
  • Email marketing $31,500 · 7%
  • Direct / Unknown $189,000 · 42%
Direct / Unknown is shown, never shared out across the channels above.
Google Ads · LeadFY2026 14 · (•••) •••-0134
Closed sale · FY2026 27$5,800
Matched · high confidence

The blind spot

What's actually happening

Employment work splits into two businesses with different economics. Aggregate enquiry counts hide which channel feeds the profitable one.

What you get

Built for Employment Law.

Fees, not enquiries

Rank channels by fees earned so one signed matter outweighs fifty enquiries.

Matters resolve much later

A matter signed this year and resolved next still traces to the ad behind it.

Defensible in a partner meeting

Only exact matches count automatically; anything weaker is flagged rather than assumed.

A worked example

The number you can take into a budget meeting.

Not impressions, not leads, not cost per click. Closed revenue, by the channel that produced it, for a period you choose — with the portion we could not trace shown rather than quietly shared out across your paid channels.

Total revenue$450,000paid fees
Attributed to a channel$261,00058% of revenue
Average deal$5,800per paid sale
Match rate70%of sales matched
ChannelSalesRevenueShare%
Google Ads31$153,00034%
LinkedIn Ads9$76,50017%
Email marketing5$31,5007%
Direct / Unknown32$189,00042%
01

Claimant and employer work should never be ranked together

Claimant matters arrive from search, often urgently, and are frequently contingent. Employer advisory work arrives through professional networks and bills hourly on retainer. Combining them into one lead count produces a ranking that describes neither.

A matter-type column splits the report, and the two rankings usually disagree — which is the finding, and the reason to run it.

02

Advisory retainers compound and are rarely credited

An employer who arrives for one dismissal question and stays on retainer for four years is worth many times a single claim, and no attribution tool credits the original campaign for year three.

Because the match is on the client rather than a session, later fees from the same client credit the channel that produced them whenever they land.

Why it matters

What changes when you can prove it.

You stop defending the budget and start growing it

"We generated 400 leads" invites an argument. "This channel closed $186,400 last quarter, here is the reconciliation" ends one. The teams that can show closed revenue by channel are the teams that get the next increase approved, because they are asking with evidence rather than with conviction.

You can cut the wrong channel without a fight

Killing spend is politically harder than adding it, because someone always owns the channel being cut. A number that reconciles to the sales export takes the argument out of the room — you are not overruling a colleague's judgement, you are reading the same ledger they are.

Your reporting survives the finance review

Platform-reported conversions do not reconcile to revenue, and eventually someone in finance notices. Reporting built from your own closed-sales export starts from the number finance already trusts, which is why it holds up when it is checked.

You answer in an afternoon, not a quarter

Because this reconciles exports rather than tracking visitors, it works on months that have already closed. You are not instrumenting now to learn something in ninety days — you can answer for last quarter today, which is usually when the question is being asked.

Honest answers

The pushback we hear from Employment Law.

They say

Our two sides of the practice are completely different.

We say

Which is why a matter-type column matters — the report splits and ranks each separately.

They say

Employer work comes through referral.

We say

Upload the referral list as a source file and it ranks alongside paid channels for the first time.

They say

Client confidentiality.

We say

A contact detail, a fee and a date. No matter details of any kind.

Pricing

Flat monthly pricing. No per-call fees.

The number here is the number on the invoice — no per-call, per-minute or per-form fees. Most employment and labour practices land on Growth — thirteen months of history to compare a month to the same month last year, and a PDF you can put in front of whoever holds the budget.

Questions

Questions we get about Employment Law.

Anything else? Talk to us — a person answers, usually the same day.

Retained matters: a client contact email or phone, the fee, and a date.

Start today

Stop guessing which ads pay off.

Upload two exports and see your real revenue by channel in minutes. Three days free, no card.